Current:Home > MySotomayor’s dissent: A president should not be a ‘king above the law’ -Streamline Finance
Sotomayor’s dissent: A president should not be a ‘king above the law’
View
Date:2025-04-15 12:54:15
WASHINGTON (AP) — In an unsparing dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said the Supreme Court allowed a president to become a “king above the law” in its ruling that limited the scope of criminal charges against former President Donald Trump for his role in the Jan. 6, 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol and efforts to overturn the election.
She called the decision, which likely ended the prospect of a trial for Trump before the November election, “utterly indefensible.”
“The court effectively creates a law-free zone around the president, upsetting the status quo that has existed since the founding,” she wrote, in a dissent joined by the other two liberal justices, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson.
Sotomayor read her dissent aloud in the courtroom, with a weighty delivery that underscored her criticism of the majority. She strongly pronounced each word, pausing at certain moments and gritting her teeth at others.
“Ironic isn’t it? The man in charge of enforcing laws can now just break them,” Sotomayor said.
Chief Justice John Roberts accused the liberal justices of fearmongering in the 6-3 majority opinion. It found that presidents aren’t above the law but must be entitled to presumptive immunity for official acts so the looming threat of a potential criminal prosecution doesn’t keep them from forcefully exercising the office’s far-reaching powers or create a cycle of prosecutions aimed at political enemies.
While the opinion allows for the possibility of prosecutions for unofficial acts, Sotomayor said it “deprives these prosecutions of any teeth” by excluding any evidence that related to official acts where the president is immune.
“This majority’s project will have disastrous consequences for the presidency and for our democracy,” she said. She ended by saying, “With fear for our democracy, I dissent.”
Trump, for his part, has denied doing anything wrong and has said this prosecution and three others are politically motivated to try to keep him from returning to the White House.
The other justices looked on in silence and largely remained still as Sotomayor spoke, with Justice Samuel Alito shuffling through papers and appearing to study them.
Sotomayor pointed to historical evidence, from the founding fathers to Watergate, that presidents could potentially face prosecution. She took a jab at the conservative majority that has made the nation’s history a guiding principle on issues like guns and abortion. “Interesting, history matters, right?”
Then she looked at the courtroom audience and concluded, “Except here.”
The majority feared that the threat of potential prosecution could constrain a president or create a “cycle of factional strife,” that the founders intended to avoid.
Sotomayor, on the other handed, pointed out that presidents have access to extensive legal advice about their actions and that criminal cases typically face high bars in court to proceed.
“It is a far greater danger if the president feels empowered to violate federal criminal law, buoyed by the knowledge of future immunity,” she said. “I am deeply troubled by the idea ... that our nation loses something valuable when the president is forced to operate within the confines of federal criminal law.”
___
Associated Press writer Stephen Groves contributed to this story.
veryGood! (16561)
Related
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
- NATO Moves to Tackle Military Greenhouse Gas Emissions Even While Girding Against Russia
- Receding rivers, party poopers, and debt ceiling watchers
- A new film explains how the smartphone market slipped through BlackBerry's hands
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
- Biden’s Been in Office for More Than 500 Days. He Still Hasn’t Appointed a Top Official to Oversee Coal Mine Reclamation
- Elon Musk says 'I've hired a new CEO' for Twitter
- Adidas finally has a plan for its stockpile of Yeezy shoes
- Juan Soto to be introduced by Mets at Citi Field after striking record $765 million, 15
- A lot of offices are still empty — and it's becoming a major risk for the economy
Ranking
- Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
- US Emissions Surged in 2021: Here’s Why in Six Charts
- Khloe Kardashian Labels Kanye West a Car Crash in Slow Motion After His Antisemitic Comments
- Shop These American-Made Brands This 4th of July Weekend from KitchenAid to Glossier
- What to know about Tuesday’s US House primaries to replace Matt Gaetz and Mike Waltz
- Shakira Makes a Literal Fashion Statement With NO Trench Coat
- As the Biden Administration Eyes Wind Leases Off California’s Coast, the Port of Humboldt Sees Opportunity
- Welcome to America! Now learn to be in debt
Recommendation
DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
Inside Clean Energy: Here’s a Cool New EV, but You Can’t Have It
Shifting Sands: Carolina’s Outer Banks Face a Precarious Future
Pretty Little Liars' Lindsey Shaw Details Getting Fired Amid Battle With Drugs and Weight
Jamie Foxx gets stitches after a glass is thrown at him during dinner in Beverly Hills
As EPA’s Region 3 Administrator, Adam Ortiz Wants the Mid-Atlantic States to Become Climate-Conscious and Resilient
Score Up to 60% Off On Good American Jeans, Dresses, and More At Nordstrom Rack
How Mila Kunis and Ashton Kutcher Keep Pulling Off the Impossible for a Celebrity Couple